Page 40 - CARILEC CE Journal Nov 21
P. 40

Because  of  that,  again,  that  affects  the  overall   MS: I want to address a question that came from
               production costs. From the utility perspective and   the  audience.  It  relates  to  effectively  the  utilities
               when viewed with renewables in the system, you’ll   falling back on the fact that they can pass through
               see the true impact of renewables on the customer.   fuel costs. I am absolutely an advocate of changing
               Having said that, what we propose to our clients is   that. I think that’s the job of where regulators, utilities
               that: one, we believe in renewables and we say it and   and stakeholders can get together and develop much
               we’re doing it. But please take a holistic approach   better formulas and much better methods of figuring
               to it. Look at how injecting a certain percentage   out how we integrate that thermal generation in the
               of renewables in your system affects the overall   renewable space and not effectively say, the utilities
               operation and the overall operating costs of your   have  carte  blanche  just  to  fall  back  on  thermal
               system. If you do that, the technology of choice will   generation and pass the cost on to the customer.
               become evident. You will notice that gone are the
               days where you are installing technologies that are   I don’t believe that the old-style regulation where
               inflexible. It will become evident that you want to   fuel costs automatically go through, whatever it is
               look at thermal technology that’s flexible. There’s no   just gets passed on to the customer. That seriously
               impact with frequent starts and stops. The machine   needs to change.
               is able to ramp up fast and ramp down very quickly   CB: Final question: when we look to the future,
               to  follow  the  intermittency  of  renewables.  This   all three of you have highlighted the need for
               addresses technology and planning.
                                                              flexibility, holistic planning, and looking at
                                                              systems in a different way. You’ve all directly—
               CB: Filipe, could you shed some light on where   or  indirectly—alluded  to  the  importance  of
               you’re seeing high demand for conversions to   stakeholder engagement. When we look to a more
               LNG?
                                                              holistically flexible future, what role do you want
                                                              to play,  how would you like to shape the market,
               FP:  Everywhere,  globally.  In  the  region  we’re   and  how  do  you  think  you  could  best  engage
               focused on, any island country, Central America,
               South  America,  places  dependent  on  mostly   stakeholders to achieve this more flexible, holistic
               Venezuela-based  heavy  fuel  oils  and  diesel.   system?
               If  you  think  about  it,  all  these  countries  have   FP: First of all, it’s about education. All the market
               been stranded for years, depending on diesel or   players  have  a  job  to  educate  those  who  need
               other fuel oils. Even if we were to take aside the   to make decisions in the next few years. We have
               environment, which we cannot, just costs alone,   observed that while people have great goals and
               it doesn’t make any sense. Given the opportunity,   even if we don’t agree on the goals, or how aggressive
               every country in the region is looking to conversion   those goals are, the goals are good goals. People
               as a first step from their current fuel to LNG. Not   are driven by something positive. For the most part,
               long ago we were talking internally, looking at the   many  people  making  decisions  are  not  educated
               map  of  the  Caribbean,  Central  America,  North   enough  on,  or  don’t  fully  understand  the  supply
               and South America, and the countries that have   chain, the value chain behind those decisions.
               converted and the ones looking to convert. If you
               look at it, several countries have already converted.
               There are RFPs ongoing in the region, and then   As Murray said, it’s going to fall a lot more on the
               several RFPs ran in the region that went nowhere.   regulator than it will on the government to decide.
               One of the conclusions we reached was that those   MS: I think the key here is to get all stakeholders
               countries that make a decision because they run   to fully understand what it takes to provide a 24-7
               their  models  and  believe  in  what  they’re  doing   electricity supply at the lowest possible cost on an
               and get a deal to convert, they get it done. Then   island  situation  where  you’re  not  interconnected
               you see all these RFPs go on for 3, 4, 5, 7 years   with another large utility that you can rely on as
               and go nowhere. To answer your question, I think   backup. In my experience over the years that is one
               everyone who is running on LNG today is looking   area that I think is always underestimated as to what
               to run on LNG. Or, they have more ambitious goals   the utilities face in doing their job by multilaterals,
               for renewables so the timing impacts.          consultants,  by  government,  by  regulators.  They




               40
   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45