Page 63 - CARILEC CE Industry Journal_Oct_2019
P. 63

After a root cause analysis and complete disassembly and   Due to the design of this Fuel Delivery Valve, there was
            inspection of the fuel pump (Fig. 32), it was revealed that   enough fuel being delivered for the cylinder to fire but at
            two internal components were not installed during the   a reduced pressure. It was also noted that there was a
            last pump  rebuild.                                 through wall crack in the Delivery Valve Assembly. It is
                                                                believed that this crack was caused by high pressure
            This detailed inspection revealed that the Fuel Delivery   being built up in the pump due to the restricted flow area
            Valve Stop and Fuel Delivery Fuel Valve Spring were not   to the fuel injector.
            installed.











































            Fig. 31 - Fuel Pump-Picture courtesy of MPR Associates




            Case Study #3-Valves Hitting Piston                 The diesel generator at this station is one of many at this
                                                                location that provide power to a Caribbean Island. The
            Operations and maintenance personnel identified a   engine is a 16 cylinder Sulzer 16ZV40/48 rated at
            mechanical “ticking” sound coming from Cylinder L1. The   11,125 BHP. Each  cylinder has  a 400mm (15.748”)
            plant’s peak pressure monitoring also identified cylinder   bore and a 480mm (18.989”) stroke and operates at
            L1 has having the highest peak pressure at 11% higher   514 rpm. This engine also employs a rotating piston
            than the engine average (Fig.32). The increase in   crown design.
            pressure was noted after a maintenance activity where
            the head was removed and reinstalled.               As shown in the engine report below (Fig 32.), it should
                                                                be  noted  that  even  though  the  peak  pressure  and
            Comprehensive engine analysis was performed which   compression pressure were the highest, the peak
            determined that the mechanical ticking was occurring just   pressure angle was earliest and the exhaust temperature
            prior (1 deg.) to Top Dead Center (TDC) on the scavenging   was below the engine average. This is caused by the
            stroke (Fig. 33). With the piston at or very near TDC on the   higher compression pressure (17%) due to the smaller
            scavenging stroke is when both the exhaust valves and   clearance volume which in turn results in earlier
            intake valves are open. As a result of the analysis   combustion and a higher peak pressure.
            performed, a maintenance activity was performed which
            indicated the valves where touching the piston at TDC. It
            was also  determined  that a 1mm shim or spacer was
            installed, and not the required 2mm spacer.
                                                                                      CE  INDUSTRY Journal    61
   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68